top of page

Arudhra gold trading scam | BJP functionary and film actor

  • Writer: Layana Mary
    Layana Mary
  • May 12, 2023
  • 2 min read

Justice G. Chandrasekharan has granted a week’s time for the Economic Offences Wing to file its reply to the plea to quash the summons, issued in connection with the ₹2,400 crore Arudhra gold trading scam.


BJP functionary R.K. Suresh, who is also an actor-producer, has moved the Madras High Court challenging the summons issued to him by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) in connection with the investigation into the ₹2,400 crore Arudhra gold trading scam.


Aarudhra trading scam, Aarudhra scam, Aarudhra gold scam, RK Suresh, Aarudhra 2400 crore
Aarudhra trading scam

Justice G. Chandrasekharan accepted a request made by Government Advocate (criminal side) S. Santhosh to grant him a week’s time to file a reply on behalf of the prosecution, before taking a call on the petitioner’s request to quash the summons, since it does not specify the documents required from him.


Senior counsel V. Raghavachari, representing the petitioner, told the court that his client was neither an accused person, nor a person who had benefitted from the transactions. He said the summons was vague and did not contain any details regarding the details required to be furnished by his client.


The judge, prima facie, concurred with the Senior Counsel and told the Government Advocate that the summons might have to be quashed because it does not specify the documents required from the petitioner and the police could be given liberty to issue fresh summons indicating the specifics.

However, Mr. Santhosh vehemently opposed the plea and requested the court to grant him a weeks’ time to submit a written reply since the case involved ₹2,400 crore of public money that had been collected by Arudhra Gold Trading Private Limited, a firm which had allegedly cheated most of its depositors.


The judge accepted the requested and adjourned the hearing on the petition by a week. When the Senior Counsel insisted on an interim order till then, he said no such order would be necessary and that a final call could be taken on the issue after receipt of the prosecution’s response in writing.

Comments


Contact Me

Tel: 123-456-7890

info@mysite.com

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon

© 2035 by Phil Steer . Powered and secured by Wix

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page